How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP Tri-Fold vs ML1050STi

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Optoma ML1050STi

What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where ML1050STi wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold
Aurzen · 2026ZIP Tri-Fold
0 advantages≈ US$1,000
vs
Optoma ML1050STi
Optoma · 2024ML1050STi
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$830
Higher score

Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than ML1050STi?

ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ML1050STi better than ZIP Tri-Fold?

  1. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
  2. Audio outputNo · ZIP Tri-Fold: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Optoma ML1050STiOptoma ML1050STi≈ US$8308.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Native panel resolution—1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—535 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)5,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—20,000:1
3D playback—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—0.8:1
Throw type—Short throw (0.4–1.0:1)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—1.77 m
Smallest image size—50″
Largest image size—100″
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—2 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—67 W
Light source life5,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—29 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—22 dB
Weight—0.4 kg
Width—112 mm
Height—57 mm
Depth—123 mm
ColoursGoldWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare