- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZIP Tri-Fold vs ML1080ST
Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Optoma ML1080ST
What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where ML1080ST wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than ML1080ST?
ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ML1080ST better than ZIP Tri-Fold?
- Light source life5,000 h vs 30,000 h6×
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
- Audio outputNo · ZIP Tri-Fold: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 1,200 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 5,000 lm | — |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 240 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.78:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.73 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2.1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 57 W |
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 28 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 24 dB |
| Weight | — | 1 kg |
| Width | — | 157 mm |
| Height | — | 68 mm |
| Depth | — | 135 mm |
| Colours | Gold | White |
