How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP Tri-Fold vs Multipic 6.1

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Overmax Multipic 6.1

What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where Multipic 6.1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold
Aurzen · 2026ZIP Tri-Fold
0 advantages≈ US$1,000
vs
Overmax Multipic 6.1
Overmax · 2026Multipic 6.1
2 advantages≈ US$580

Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than Multipic 6.1?

ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Multipic 6.1 better than ZIP Tri-Fold?

  1. Light source life5,000 h vs 7,000 h+40%
  2. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light source—LED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)5,000 lm—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.5:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.32 m
Lens shift—None
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life5,000 h7,000 h
Design & noise
ColoursGoldBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare