- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FHD5000 vs NeoPix 730
Celexon FHD5000 vs Philips NeoPix 730
What FHD5000 does better (2) and where NeoPix 730 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Setup & placement2.3
9.4Noise, lifetime & portability9.4
Why is FHD5000 better than NeoPix 730?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 3,000:133.3×
- Largest image size135″ vs 120″+12%
Why is NeoPix 730 better than FHD5000?
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 20 W2×
- Power consumption130 W vs 100 W+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.65:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 3.65 m |
| Largest image size | 135″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 20 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 130 W | 100 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.75 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Width | — | 305 mm |
| Height | — | 119 mm |
| Depth | — | 319 mm |
| Colours | Black, White | Black |
