How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FHD5000 vs PX748-4K

Celexon FHD5000 vs ViewSonic PX748-4K

What FHD5000 does better (3) and where PX748-4K wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Celexon FHD5000
Celexon · 2021FHD5000
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$25
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic PX748-4K
ViewSonic · 2021PX748-4K
6.3Score
3 advantages
2.4Setup & placement6.0
9.4Noise, lifetime & portability3.7

Why is FHD5000 better than PX748-4K?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 4,000 h7.5×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 12,000:18.3×
  3. Power consumption130 W vs 310 W2.4×

Why is PX748-4K better than FHD5000?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Maximum refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
  3. Largest image size135″ vs 300″2.2×
Specifications

Side by side

Celexon FHD5000Celexon FHD5000≈ US$258.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—4,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:112,000:1
HDR support—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz240 Hz
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.35:11.13:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—1.47:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.99 m2.5 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size135″300″
Optical zoom—2×
Lens shiftNoneNone
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption130 W310 W
Light source life30,000 h4,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)—20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—32 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—27 dB
Weight2.75 kg2.8 kg
Width—312 mm
Height—108 mm
Depth—222 mm
ColoursBlack, WhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare