How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FHD5000 vs X11-4K

Celexon FHD5000 vs ViewSonic X11-4K

What FHD5000 does better (1) and where X11-4K wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Celexon FHD5000
Celexon · 2021FHD5000
8.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$25
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic X11-4K
ViewSonic · 2023X11-4K
8.8Score
6 advantages
2.4Setup & placement2.8
9.4Noise, lifetime & portability9.2

Why is FHD5000 better than X11-4K?

  1. Weight2.75 kg vs 4.5 kg+64%

Why is X11-4K better than FHD5000?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 16 W+60%
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 3,000,000:130×
  4. Ethernet (LAN)No · FHD5000: Yes
  5. Largest image size135″ vs 200″+48%
  6. Power consumption130 W vs 115 W+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Celexon FHD5000Celexon FHD5000≈ US$258.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:13,000,000:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.35:10.8:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Short throw (0.4–1.0:1)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.99 m1.77 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size135″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W16 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version—2
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption130 W115 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—25 dB
Weight2.75 kg4.5 kg
Width—261 mm
Height—146 mm
Depth—271 mm
ColoursBlack, WhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare