- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DBX3 Pro vs VPL-XW7000ES
Dangbei DBX3 Pro vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES
What DBX3 Pro does better (0) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Picture7.8
8.8Setup & placement9.4
Why is DBX3 Pro better than VPL-XW7000ES?
DBX3 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than DBX3 Pro?
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- 4K method4K by pixel shifting vs Native 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | Native 4K |
| Display technology | DLP | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | — | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,200 lm | 3,200 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HLG | — |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.35:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.84:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.99 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Obstacle avoidance | Yes | — |
| Automatic screen fit | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| DTS | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 420 W |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | — | 14 kg |
| Width | — | 460 mm |
| Height | — | 210 mm |
| Depth | — | 517 mm |









