- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PR-4300 vs NeoPix 100
Denver PR-4300 vs Philips NeoPix 100
What PR-4300 does better (3) and where NeoPix 100 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is PR-4300 better than NeoPix 100?
- Resolution (on screen)2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)8,000:1 vs 3,000:12.7×
- Native panel resolution2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Why is NeoPix 100 better than PR-4300?
NeoPix 100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 400 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 8,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 3.25 m |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.8 kg |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 205 mm |
| Depth | — | 78 mm |
| Colours | Grey, White | White |
