- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EF-2X vs K300s
Epson EF-2X vs Yaber K300s
What EF-2X does better (3) and where K300s wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is EF-2X better than K300s?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 1,500:13,333.3×
- Fan noise23 dB vs 27 dB+17%
- Largest image size150″ vs 100″+50%
Why is K300s better than EF-2X?
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 30 W6×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · EF-2X: Yes
- Audio outputNo · EF-2X: Yes
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.8 kg+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | — |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.82:1 | 2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.21 m | 2.21 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 100″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 30 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 23 dB | 27 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 19 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.8 kg |
| Width | 197 mm | — |
| Height | 191 mm | — |
| Depth | 113 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
