- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CC200 vs NeoPix Prime 2
HP CC200 vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2
What CC200 does better (3) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
2.3Picture2.2
Why is CC200 better than NeoPix Prime 2?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 180 lm+11%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than CC200?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · CC200: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 180 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | — |
| Largest image size | 80″ | 80″ |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 3 kg |
| Width | 128 mm | — |
| Height | 203 mm | — |
| Depth | 136 mm | — |
| Colours | Yellow | Silver, Black |
