- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IN1089SL vs UHZ67
InFocus IN1089SL vs Optoma UHZ67
What IN1089SL does better (2) and where UHZ67 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is IN1089SL better than UHZ67?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,500 lm vs 4,300 lm+5%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Why is UHZ67 better than IN1089SL?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,500 lm | 4,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 300,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| HDMI version | 2 | — |
| USB port | No | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 4,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Black |
