- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs IN1089SL
Acer QT12 vs InFocus IN1089SL
What QT12 does better (2) and where IN1089SL wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than IN1089SL?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 4,500 lm+44%
- Light source life6,500 h vs 4,500 h+44%
Why is IN1089SL better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 4,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 300,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 4,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | White |
