- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ9 vs DLA-NZ900
JVC DLA-NZ9 vs JVC DLA-NZ900
What DLA-NZ9 does better (0) and where DLA-NZ900 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is DLA-NZ9 better than DLA-NZ900?
DLA-NZ9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is DLA-NZ900 better than DLA-NZ9?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 150,000:1+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | 150,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.28:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.61:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.83 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | 60″ |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 440 W | 440 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 24 dB |
| Weight | 25 kg | 25.3 kg |
| Width | — | 500 mm |
| Height | — | 234 mm |
| Depth | — | 528 mm |
| Colours | Blue, Yellow, Black | — |
