- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ9 vs NeoPix Prime 2
JVC DLA-NZ9 vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2
What DLA-NZ9 does better (5) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Picture2.2
Why is DLA-NZ9 better than NeoPix Prime 2?
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 3,000:133.3×
- Largest image size300″ vs 80″3.8×
- Native panel resolution4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix Prime 2: No
Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than DLA-NZ9?
- Weight25 kg vs 3 kg8.3×
- Audio outputNo · DLA-NZ9: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | — |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | — |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 180 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | — |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 440 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | — |
| Weight | 25 kg | 3 kg |
| Colours | Blue, Yellow, Black | Silver, Black |
