- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 75 vs LV-HD240
Kodak Luma 75 vs La Vague LV-HD240
What Luma 75 does better (0) and where LV-HD240 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 75 better than LV-HD240?
Luma 75 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LV-HD240 better than Luma 75?
- Largest image size80″ vs 168″2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 75 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 2,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,300:1 | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 80″ | 168″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 4 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 16 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.14 kg | — |
| Width | 80 mm | — |
| Height | 20 mm | — |
| Depth | 80 mm | — |
| Colours | White, Silver | White |
