- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 75 vs 58BHD2500
Kodak Luma 75 vs Salora 58BHD2500
What Luma 75 does better (1) and where 58BHD2500 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 75 better than 58BHD2500?
- Audio outputYes · 58BHD2500: No
Why is 58BHD2500 better than Luma 75?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 50,000 h+67%
- Largest image size80″ vs 200″2.5×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Fan noise30 dB vs 25 dB+20%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,300:1 vs 1,500:1+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 75 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,300:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 80″ | 200″ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 4 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 25 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 16 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.14 kg | — |
| Width | 80 mm | — |
| Height | 20 mm | — |
| Depth | 80 mm | — |
| Colours | White, Silver | White |
