How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 75 vs ML1050ST+

Kodak Luma 75 vs Optoma ML1050ST+

What Luma 75 does better (3) and where ML1050ST+ wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 75
Kodak · 2019Luma 75
3 advantages≈ US$240
vs
Optoma ML1050ST+
Optoma · 2019ML1050ST+
8.6Score
5 advantages
Higher score
9.0Noise, lifetime & portability8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Luma 75ML1050ST+
80 × 2080112 × 57123
Luma 75ML1050ST+Difference
Height20 mm57 mm−37 mm
Width80 mm112 mm−32 mm
Depth80 mm123 mm−43 mm
Weight0.1 kg0.4 kg−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Luma 75 better than ML1050ST+?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Power consumption4 W vs 77 W19.2×
  3. Weight0.14 kg vs 0.42 kg3×

Why is ML1050ST+ better than Luma 75?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)75 lm vs 1,000 lm13.3×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,300:1 vs 20,000:115.4×
  3. Maximum refresh rate60 Hz vs 85 Hz+42%
  4. Fan noise30 dB vs 22 dB+36%
  5. Largest image size80″ vs 100″+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak Luma 75Kodak Luma 75≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Native panel resolution—1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)75 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,300:120,000:1
HDR support—No
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate60 Hz85 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—0.8:1
Throw type—Short throw (0.4–1.0:1)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—1.77 m
Largest image size80″100″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption4 W77 W
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB22 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)16 dB—
Weight0.14 kg0.42 kg
Width80 mm112 mm
Height20 mm57 mm
Depth80 mm123 mm
ColoursWhite, SilverWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare