- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 75 vs Astro
Kodak Luma 75 vs Nebula Astro
What Luma 75 does better (1) and where Astro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Luma 75Astro
| Luma 75 | Astro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 20 mm | 91 mm | −71 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 89 mm | −9 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 82 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 0.1 kg | 0.4 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Luma 75 better than Astro?
- Weight0.14 kg vs 0.38 kg2.7×
Why is Astro better than Luma 75?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)75 lm vs 100 lm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 75 lm | 100 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,300:1 | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.39:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.08 m |
| Largest image size | 80″ | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | 4 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 16 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.14 kg | 0.38 kg |
| Width | 80 mm | 89 mm |
| Height | 20 mm | 91 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 82 mm |
| Colours | White, Silver | — |
