How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 100 vs Q1

Philips NeoPix 100 vs Strong Q1

What NeoPix 100 does better (1) and where Q1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 100
Philips · 2024NeoPix 100
1 advantage≈ US$85
vs
Strong Q1
Strong · 2025Q1
3 advantages≈ US$100
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 100Q1
158 × 2057897 × 150140
NeoPix 100Q1Difference
Height205 mm150 mm+55 mm
Width158 mm97 mm+61 mm
Depth78 mm140 mm−62 mm
Weight0.8 kg0.8 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 100 better than Q1?

  1. Audio outputYes · Q1: No

Why is Q1 better than NeoPix 100?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Largest image size65″ vs 120″+85%
Specifications

Side by side

Strong Q1Strong Q1≈ US$100
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—180 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m—
Largest image size65″120″
AutofocusNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—No
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesNo
Design & noise
Weight0.8 kg0.8 kg
Width158 mm97 mm
Height205 mm150 mm
Depth78 mm140 mm
ColoursWhiteGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare