How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 100 vs Apollo P10

Philips NeoPix 100 vs ULTIMEA Apollo P10

What NeoPix 100 does better (2) and where Apollo P10 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 100
Philips · 2024NeoPix 100
2 advantages≈ US$85
vs
ULTIMEA Apollo P10
ULTIMEA · 2024Apollo P10
3 advantages≈ US$100

Why is NeoPix 100 better than Apollo P10?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 1,000:13×

Why is Apollo P10 better than NeoPix 100?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  2. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  3. Weight0.8 kg vs 0.6 kg+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:11,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.35:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m2.99 m
Smallest image size—120″
Largest image size65″—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs1—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputYes—
Audio outputYes—
Design & noise
Fan noise—30 dB
Weight0.8 kg0.6 kg
Width158 mm—
Height205 mm—
Depth78 mm—
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare