- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 100 vs Mini Pro
Philips NeoPix 100 vs Wanbo Mini Pro
What NeoPix 100 does better (2) and where Mini Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix 100Mini Pro
| NeoPix 100 | Mini Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 205 mm | 86 mm | +119 mm |
| Width | 158 mm | 165 mm | −7 mm |
| Depth | 78 mm | 122 mm | −44 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.6 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix 100 better than Mini Pro?
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×
- Audio outputYes · Mini Pro: No
Why is Mini Pro better than NeoPix 100?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size65″ vs 88″+35%
- Weight0.8 kg vs 0.64 kg+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | 1.33:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | 2.94 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 88″ |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.64 kg |
| Width | 158 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 205 mm | 86 mm |
| Depth | 78 mm | 122 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
