- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 140 vs Mini XS01
Philips NeoPix 140 vs Xiaomi Mini XS01
What NeoPix 140 does better (0) and where Mini XS01 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix 140Mini XS01
| NeoPix 140 | Mini XS01 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 142 mm | 86 mm | +56 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 165 mm | −97 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 122 mm | −48 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix 140 better than Mini XS01?
NeoPix 140 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Mini XS01 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 200 lm+33%
- Native panel resolution1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size65″ vs 120″+85%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 120″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 40 dB |
| Weight | 0.3 kg | — |
| Width | 68 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 142 mm | 86 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 122 mm |
| Colours | — | Yellow |
