How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 150 vs NeoPix 160

Philips NeoPix 150 vs Philips NeoPix 160

What NeoPix 150 does better (1) and where NeoPix 160 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 150
Philips · 2025NeoPix 150
1 advantage≈ US$160
vs
Philips NeoPix 160
Philips · 2025NeoPix 160
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$190
Higher score
2.2Picture2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 150NeoPix 160
126 × 208144207 × 147171
NeoPix 150NeoPix 160Difference
Height208 mm147 mm+61 mm
Width126 mm207 mm−81 mm
Depth144 mm171 mm−27 mm
Weight1.8 kg1.2 kg+0.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 150 better than NeoPix 160?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 5 W+20%

Why is NeoPix 160 better than NeoPix 150?

  1. Weight1.85 kg vs 1.23 kg+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 160Philips NeoPix 160≈ US$1903.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Lens shift—None
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W5 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.85 kg1.23 kg
Width126 mm207 mm
Height208 mm147 mm
Depth144 mm171 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare