- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 150 vs Picasso
Philips NeoPix 150 vs Prixton Picasso
What NeoPix 150 does better (1) and where Picasso wins (3) — every spec side by side.
2.2Picture2.4
Why is NeoPix 150 better than Picasso?
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 5 W+20%
Why is Picasso better than NeoPix 150?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 260 lm+4%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 260 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | — |
| Width | 126 mm | — |
| Height | 208 mm | — |
| Depth | 144 mm | — |
| Colours | — | White |
