How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 150 vs Cube 1

Philips NeoPix 150 vs Wanbo Cube 1

What NeoPix 150 does better (4) and where Cube 1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 150
Philips · 2025NeoPix 150
4 advantages≈ US$160
vs
Wanbo Cube 1
Wanbo · 2026Cube 1
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$140
Higher score
2.2Picture2.0

Why is NeoPix 150 better than Cube 1?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 110 lm2.3×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  4. Audio outputYes · Cube 1: No

Why is Cube 1 better than NeoPix 150?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 8 W+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Wanbo Cube 1Wanbo Cube 1≈ US$1403.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm110 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m2.66 m
Lens shift—None
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W8 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Design & noise
Fan noise—28 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—28 dB
Weight1.85 kg—
Width126 mm—
Height208 mm—
Depth144 mm—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare