- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 160 vs MIRA 1
Philips NeoPix 160 vs Strong MIRA 1
What NeoPix 160 does better (2) and where MIRA 1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture2.4
2.4Smart features & sound5.5
Why is NeoPix 160 better than MIRA 1?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Weight1.23 kg vs 2.5 kg2×
Why is MIRA 1 better than NeoPix 160?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 300 lm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 60 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 55 dB |
| Weight | 1.23 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Width | 207 mm | — |
| Height | 147 mm | — |
| Depth | 171 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Green |
