How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 160 vs NeoPix 250

Philips NeoPix 160 vs Philips NeoPix 250

What NeoPix 160 does better (2) and where NeoPix 250 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 160
Philips · 2025NeoPix 160
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 250
Philips · 2025NeoPix 250
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$260
2.4Picture2.2
2.4Smart features & sound2.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 160NeoPix 250
207 × 147171239 × 188141
NeoPix 160NeoPix 250Difference
Height147 mm188 mm−41 mm
Width207 mm239 mm−32 mm
Depth171 mm141 mm+30 mm
Weight1.2 kg2.5 kg−1.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 160 better than NeoPix 250?

  1. Weight1.23 kg vs 2.5 kg2×
  2. Audio outputYes · NeoPix 250: No

Why is NeoPix 250 better than NeoPix 160?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 6 W+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 160Philips NeoPix 160≈ US$1903.6
Philips NeoPix 250Philips NeoPix 250≈ US$2603.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
4K method—4K input only (downscaled)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.31:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.9 m
Smallest image size—80″
Largest image size—200″
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVGoogle TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-inYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.23 kg2.5 kg
Width207 mm239 mm
Height147 mm188 mm
Depth171 mm141 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare