- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 160 vs Picasso
Philips NeoPix 160 vs Prixton Picasso
What NeoPix 160 does better (0) and where Picasso wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture2.4
Why is NeoPix 160 better than Picasso?
NeoPix 160 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Picasso better than NeoPix 160?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 260 lm+4%
- Light source life30,000 h vs 50,000 h+67%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 260 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.23 kg | — |
| Width | 207 mm | — |
| Height | 147 mm | — |
| Depth | 171 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
