- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 160 vs 43BHM2251 HD
Philips NeoPix 160 vs Salora 43BHM2251 HD
What NeoPix 160 does better (5) and where 43BHM2251 HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture2.1
Why is NeoPix 160 better than 43BHM2251 HD?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 180 lm+39%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Audio outputYes · 43BHM2251 HD: No
- Weight1.23 kg vs 1.5 kg+22%
Why is 43BHM2251 HD better than NeoPix 160?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 50,000 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 180 lm |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.27:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.81 m |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 70 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | 1.23 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Width | 207 mm | — |
| Height | 147 mm | 87 mm |
| Depth | 171 mm | 185 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
