- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 200 vs PT-1
Philips NeoPix 200 vs Rollei PT-1
What NeoPix 200 does better (5) and where PT-1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Picture3.5
2.0Setup & placement6.5
Why is NeoPix 200 better than PT-1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Wi-FiYes · PT-1: No
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Weight1.35 kg vs 1.5 kg+11%
Why is PT-1 better than NeoPix 200?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 220 lm+10%
- Largest image size60″ vs 200″3.3×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 5,000:1+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 220 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 5,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.44:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 3.19 m |
| Smallest image size | 24″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 60″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.35 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Colours | Silver, Black, White | Grey |
