How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 200 vs M10

Philips NeoPix 200 vs ViewSonic M10

What NeoPix 200 does better (2) and where M10 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 200
Philips · 2024NeoPix 200
4.0Score
2 advantages
vs
ViewSonic M10
ViewSonic · 2024M10
5.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
2.0Setup & placement6.4

Why is NeoPix 200 better than M10?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Audio outputYes · M10: No

Why is M10 better than NeoPix 200?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 3,000,000:11,000×
  2. Largest image size60″ vs 180″3×
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:13,000,000:1
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.35:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.99 m2.66 m
Smallest image size24″40″
Largest image size60″180″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—7 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version—2
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—51 W
Light source life20,000 h20,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—29 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—26 dB
Weight1.35 kg1.36 kg
Width—202 mm
Height—92 mm
Depth—165 mm
ColoursSilver, Black, WhiteGrey, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare