How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 200 vs M1E Max

Philips NeoPix 200 vs ViewSonic M1E Max

What NeoPix 200 does better (2) and where M1E Max wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 200
Philips · 2024NeoPix 200
4.0Score
2 advantages
vs
ViewSonic M1E Max
ViewSonic · 2025M1E Max
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$540
Higher score
4.7Picture5.0
2.0Setup & placement6.0

Why is NeoPix 200 better than M1E Max?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Weight1.35 kg vs 1.8 kg+33%

Why is M1E Max better than NeoPix 200?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 120,000:140×
  3. Largest image size60″ vs 150″2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic M1E MaxViewSonic M1E Max≈ US$5406.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1120,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.35:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.99 m2.66 m
Smallest image size24″40″
Largest image size60″150″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—25 dB
Weight1.35 kg1.8 kg
Width—220 mm
Height—125 mm
Depth—190 mm
ColoursSilver, Black, WhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare