How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Easy vs NeoPix Easy 2+

Philips NeoPix Easy vs Philips NeoPix Easy 2+

What NeoPix Easy does better (1) and where NeoPix Easy 2+ wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Easy
Philips · 2019NeoPix Easy
6.8Score
1 advantage
vs
Philips NeoPix Easy 2+
Philips · 2021NeoPix Easy 2+
8.6Score
4 advantages
Higher score
6.0Setup & placement5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix EasyNeoPix Easy 2+
207 × 84150207 × 84150
NeoPix EasyNeoPix Easy 2+Difference
Height84 mm84 mm=
Width207 mm207 mm=
Depth150 mm150 mm=
Weight0.9 kg0.9 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix Easy better than NeoPix Easy 2+?

  1. Largest image size80″ vs 60″+33%

Why is NeoPix Easy 2+ better than NeoPix Easy?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)4 W vs 6 W+50%
  3. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  4. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1280 × 720 (HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,600 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.1 m
Smallest image size24″24″
Largest image size80″60″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)4 W6 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—42 W
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.86 kg0.86 kg
Width207 mm207 mm
Height84 mm84 mm
Depth150 mm150 mm
ColoursSilver, BlackSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare