- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix Easy vs 58BHD2500
Philips NeoPix Easy vs Salora 58BHD2500
What NeoPix Easy does better (2) and where 58BHD2500 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is NeoPix Easy better than 58BHD2500?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 1,500:12×
- Audio outputYes · 58BHD2500: No
Why is 58BHD2500 better than NeoPix Easy?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life20,000 h vs 50,000 h2.5×
- Largest image size80″ vs 200″2.5×
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,600 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 24″ | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 80″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 4 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | 0.86 kg | — |
| Width | 207 mm | — |
| Height | 84 mm | — |
| Depth | 150 mm | — |
| Colours | Silver, Black | White |
