- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- 58BHD2500 vs M1
Salora 58BHD2500 vs ViewSonic M1
What 58BHD2500 does better (5) and where M1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 58BHD2500 better than M1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Light source life50,000 h vs 30,000 h+67%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Largest image size200″ vs 100″2×
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is M1 better than 58BHD2500?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 120,000:180×
- Audio outputNo · 58BHD2500: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 250 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,500 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 120,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 50″ | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | — | 55 W |
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 25 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 0.8 kg |
| Width | — | 148 mm |
| Height | — | 41 mm |
| Depth | — | 126 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
