How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TX-177 vs Apollo P10

Technaxx TX-177 vs ULTIMEA Apollo P10

What TX-177 does better (3) and where Apollo P10 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Technaxx TX-177
Technaxx · 2022TX-177
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
ULTIMEA Apollo P10
ULTIMEA · 2024Apollo P10
2 advantages≈ US$100

Why is TX-177 better than Apollo P10?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 1,000:1+50%

Why is Apollo P10 better than TX-177?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · TX-177: Yes
  2. Weight1.36 kg vs 0.6 kg2.3×
Specifications

Side by side

Technaxx TX-177Technaxx TX-177≈ US$1306.7
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:11,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.35:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.99 m
Smallest image size50″120″
Largest image size200″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs2—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption70 W—
Light source life40,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—30 dB
Weight1.36 kg0.6 kg
Width187 mm—
Height96 mm—
Depth234 mm—
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare