How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TX-177 vs L1

Technaxx TX-177 vs Yaber L1

What TX-177 does better (5) and where L1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Technaxx TX-177
Technaxx · 2022TX-177
6.7Score
5 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
Yaber L1
Yaber · 2025L1
2 advantages≈ US$120
7.8Noise, lifetime & portability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

TX-177L1
187 × 96234160 × 118125
TX-177L1Difference
Height96 mm118 mm−22 mm
Width187 mm160 mm+27 mm
Depth234 mm125 mm+109 mm
Weight1.4 kg1 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TX-177 better than L1?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  2. Light source life40,000 h vs 20,000 h2×
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  4. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  5. Audio outputYes · L1: No

Why is L1 better than TX-177?

  1. Weight1.36 kg vs 0.96 kg+42%
  2. Power consumption70 W vs 65 W+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Technaxx TX-177Technaxx TX-177≈ US$1306.7
Yaber L1Yaber L1≈ US$120
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1—
Lens & placement
Smallest image size50″—
Largest image size200″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption70 W65 W
Light source life40,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.36 kg0.96 kg
Width187 mm160 mm
Height96 mm118 mm
Depth234 mm125 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare