1
XGIMI · 2022Halo+ GTV
13% pricier ≈ US$540
- Weight 1.6 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Largest image size 120″ vs 100″
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 200:1 vs 3,000:1
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Attenborough.film
- Projectors
- Philips NeoPix 520
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Philips NeoPix 520
10 home cinema projectors at a similar price that compete with the NeoPix 520 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the NeoPix 520
10% pricier ≈ US$530
- Automatic keystone correction
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 20,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Largest image size 300″ vs 100″
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 800 (WXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life 6,000 h vs 30,000 h
3
Acer · 2025X139Wi
Same price ≈ US$480
- Automatic keystone correction
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.4 kg
42% pricier ≈ US$680
- Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Automatic keystone correction
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 10,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Power consumption 295 W vs 100 W
- Built-in speakers (total output) 10 W vs 14 W
38% pricier ≈ US$660
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 2,000,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Largest image size 300″ vs 100″
- Power consumption 139 W vs 100 W
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.4 kg
6
La Vague · 2022LV-HD500
38% cheaper ≈ US$300
- Largest image size 200″ vs 100″
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.4 kg
29% cheaper ≈ US$340
- Built-in speakers (total output) 20 W vs 14 W
- Largest image size 120″ vs 100″
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.4 kg
4% pricier ≈ US$500
- Built-in speakers (total output) 36 W vs 14 W
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Weight 5.1 kg vs 2.4 kg
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Lens shift Vertical vs None
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 3,000,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Power consumption 180 W vs 100 W
- Weight 3.3 kg vs 2.4 kg