10% cheaper ≈ US$190
- Power consumption 42 W vs 100 W
- Wi-Fi
- Weight 0.85 kg vs 1.2 kg
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Alternatives to Philips NeoPix Ultra One
10 portable & mini projectors at a similar price that compete with the NeoPix Ultra One — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the NeoPix Ultra One
5% pricier ≈ US$220
- Largest image size 150″ vs 65″
- Wi-Fi
- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
14% pricier ≈ US$240
- Autofocus
- Ethernet (LAN)
- Largest image size 120″ vs 65″
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Same price ≈ US$210
- Autofocus
- Largest image size 150″ vs 65″
- Wi-Fi
- Built-in speakers (total output) 6 W vs 10 W
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 1,500:1 vs 3,000:1
10% pricier ≈ US$230
- Power consumption 42 W vs 100 W
- Wi-Fi
- Weight 0.85 kg vs 1.2 kg
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
38% pricier ≈ US$290
- Wi-Fi
- Largest image size 80″ vs 65″
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
10% pricier ≈ US$230
- Autofocus
- Light source life 50,000 h vs 30,000 h
- Wi-Fi
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
14% cheaper ≈ US$180
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 15,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Largest image size 300″ vs 65″
- Wi-Fi
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
5% pricier ≈ US$220
- Autofocus
- Largest image size 150″ vs 65″
- Wi-Fi
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
10% pricier ≈ US$230
- Autofocus
- Wi-Fi
- Largest image size 120″ vs 65″
- Built-in speakers (total output) 8 W vs 10 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2