- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs TH575C
Acer QT12 vs BenQ TH575C
What QT12 does better (1) and where TH575C wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,800 lm+71%
Why is TH575C better than QT12?
TH575C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | — |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,800 lm |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.3 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.1× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 34 dB |
| Weight | — | 2.3 kg |
| Width | — | 296 mm |
| Height | — | 120 mm |
| Depth | — | 237 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
