- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs W5850
Acer QT12 vs BenQ W5850
What QT12 does better (1) and where W5850 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than W5850?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 2,600 lm2.5×
Why is W5850 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 2,600 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 380 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | — | 10.1 kg |
| Width | — | 525 mm |
| Height | — | 145 mm |
| Depth | — | 392 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
