- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs Lifestudio Flex Special
Acer QT12 vs Epson Lifestudio Flex Special
What QT12 does better (1) and where Lifestudio Flex Special wins (2) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture4.3
Why is QT12 better than Lifestudio Flex Special?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 1,000 lm6.5×
Why is Lifestudio Flex Special better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | 3LCD |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 1,000 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.21:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.68 m |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 23 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.9 kg |
| Width | — | 190 mm |
| Height | — | 250 mm |
| Depth | — | 198 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
