- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs Lifestudio Flex Special Lux Edition
Acer QT12 vs Epson Lifestudio Flex Special Lux Edition
What QT12 does better (1) and where Lifestudio Flex Special Lux Edition wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Picture5.3
Why is QT12 better than Lifestudio Flex Special Lux Edition?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 1,000 lm6.5×
Why is Lifestudio Flex Special Lux Edition better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | 3LCD |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 5,000,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 110 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 28 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 23 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.9 kg |
| Width | — | 190 mm |
| Height | — | 251 mm |
| Depth | — | 198 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
