How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QT12 vs N1S 4K

Acer QT12 vs JMGO N1S 4K

What QT12 does better (1) and where N1S 4K wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer QT12
Acer · 2026QT12
1 advantage
vs
JMGO N1S 4K
JMGO · 2025N1S 4K
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$860
Higher score
6.8Picture4.4

Why is QT12 better than N1S 4K?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 1,700 lm3.8×

Why is N1S 4K better than QT12?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

JMGO N1S 4KJMGO N1S 4K≈ US$8608.7
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyLCD (single panel)DLP
Light sourceLEDRGB triple laser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm1,700 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,600:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Colour gamut (BT.2020)—110%
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—200″
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Built-in stand / gimbal—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—5 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—2.1
HDMI eARC—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life6,500 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—2.2 kg
Width—187 mm
Height—191 mm
Depth—165 mm
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare