- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs Cine Compact 1
Acer QT12 vs Leica Cine Compact 1
What QT12 does better (1) and where Cine Compact 1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Picture4.3
Why is QT12 better than Cine Compact 1?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 1,700 lm3.8×
Why is Cine Compact 1 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 1,700 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.21 m |
| Largest image size | — | 220″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 20 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | VIDAA |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 120 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 29 dB |
| Weight | — | 4.4 kg |
| Colours | White | Grey |
