- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs ProBeam BF50RG
Acer QT12 vs LG ProBeam BF50RG
What QT12 does better (1) and where ProBeam BF50RG wins (6) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture9.5
Why is QT12 better than ProBeam BF50RG?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+30%
Why is ProBeam BF50RG better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.3:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.08:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | webOS (LG) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 380 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 29 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | — | 9.7 kg |
| Width | — | 370 mm |
| Height | — | 156 mm |
| Depth | — | 290 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
