- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs MultiVision PRO
Acer QT12 vs Manta MultiVision PRO
What QT12 does better (1) and where MultiVision PRO wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Picture2.9
Why is QT12 better than MultiVision PRO?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 800 lm8.1×
Why is MultiVision PRO better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 50,000 h7.7×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 800 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 200 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 34 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.5 kg |
| Height | — | 108 mm |
| Depth | — | 239 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
