- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs Photon Beam PK53 DLP UHD 4K
Acer QT12 vs Optoma Photon Beam PK53 DLP UHD 4K
What QT12 does better (2) and where Photon Beam PK53 DLP UHD 4K wins (2) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture8.5
Why is QT12 better than Photon Beam PK53 DLP UHD 4K?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 4,100 lm+59%
- Light source life6,500 h vs 3,000 h2.2×
Why is Photon Beam PK53 DLP UHD 4K better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 4,100 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.6:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.54 m |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 3,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Black |
