- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs UHZ36STe
Acer QT12 vs Optoma UHZ36STe
What QT12 does better (2) and where UHZ36STe wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than UHZ36STe?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 4,000 lm+62%
- Light source life6,500 h vs 4,000 h+62%
Why is UHZ36STe better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 4,000 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.1:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.44 m |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 4,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Black |
