- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs UHZ78LV
Acer QT12 vs Optoma UHZ78LV
What QT12 does better (1) and where UHZ78LV wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than UHZ78LV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+30%
Why is UHZ78LV better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 30,000 h4.6×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 33×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 5,000 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 85 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 3 |
| HDMI version | — | 2.1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 28 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | — | 11.5 kg |
| Width | — | 498 mm |
| Height | — | 171 mm |
| Depth | — | 331 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
